Country Music Superstar Darryl Worley has followed in the footsteps of Great Men that are Patriots for America, like Ray Stevens and The Charlie Daniels Band. His newest album "Sounds Like Life" is topping charts and who can forget in 2003 the Tennessee General Assembly issued a decree recognizing Worleyfor his support of American troops with his hit song "Have You Forgotten," Darryl has stepped his way up the charts to Country Music Stardom.
Darryl recently did an interview with WQYK Tampa Bay's 99.5 released the new single "Keep The Change," which is sure to become a hit, and shows the sentiment and frustration of American people, as the country is tyrannically being overrun by Fascists dressed in Sheeps clothing.
Thank you Darryl Worley for keeping the Spirit alive!
Not too long ago, there was a TV Program called "Jericho." The storyline centers on the residents of Jericho, a small, rural Kansas town, in the aftermath of nuclear attacks on 23 major cities in the United States. It turned out that the attacks were neither a foreign nor domestic terrorist act, but a conspiracy of unknown perpetrators within the highest level of the former government. Jericho's residents deal with the reality of a Cheyenne-based Allied States of America government. Initially welcomed as saviors, the government's military and private contractor mercenary agents transform life in Jericho into a repressive police-state. It seems that maybe the writer had figured out the "plan" ahead of time. Last year, there were 16 Czars that Obama had appointed. Expanding government. Now that number has rose to 38 - the highest ever appointed. To compare. in the 8 years Bush, Jr was in office, he only appointed 35, then the highest ever. Clinton before him, 7, and before that all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt an average of 3.1 per President. To top that there are also 10 people that sit on a Board of Governors, appointed by Obama. None of these 48 people have been approved by Congress, and none have sworn to uphold The Constitution.
Wait... This is where it get's good, and when I say good, I mean bad, because we now live in Bizarro World (obscure Superman reference). According to Article 1 of the Constitution, only Congress is allowed to make federal law. However, since the implementation of the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933 which placed the United States under a state of emergency and suspended the Constitution (and has never been rescinded), every president has usurped lawmaking power through Executive Orders.
In July 1996, President Clinton signed Executive Order 13010. It created the President's Commission for Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP) which was designed to allow the federal government to "protect continuity of government: from acts of terrorism, both physical and electronic. If the government could instigate a national emergency, this would allow the President to invoke all the Executive Orders in a "supposed effort" to reduce the catastrophic impact of this crisis. These so-called "well intentioned" actions are prepared to strip the rights of a vast majority of the people. In plain language, the Clinton Executive Order takes power away from "we the people" and state governments and gives it to the Federal Government.
This then led to the Bush, Jr White House issuing National Security Presidential Directive 51 / Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20. The joint directive "establishes a comprehensive national policy on the continuity of FEDERAL GOVERNMENT structures and operations, and a National Continuity Coordinator responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of FEDERAL CONTINUITY POLICIES. Unlike the previous orders by Clinton and Bush Sr, that preceded with continuity of CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, this directive never mentions the Constitution. With Barack Obama's extension of Continuity of Government, and Congressmen dropping like flies, it is obvious that our U.S. Government hangs by a thread. This "Shadow" Government, as The Washington Post calls it, will separate us from our Bill of Rights, Constitution and Declaration of Independence. Even before this latest appointment, the top-ranking Democrat in the Senate wrote President Obama a letter saying that these czars are unconstitutional. President Obama’s “czar strategy” is an unpreceden years ago, it has always been considered possible that they are all unconstitutional. But it never built to a critical mass to elicit a court fight. These czars were few and far between, and rarely did anything that seriously ruffled any feathers. But President Obama has taken this to an unprecedented level, to the point where these appointments are dangerous to our constitutional regime. There are executive orders on the books that have not yet been fully utilized. These orders, all which can be put into effect any time an “emergency” is declared, are in direct violation of Article 4 Section 4 of the United States Constitution which guarantees to every State in the Union a republican (representative) form of government. Martial law can be declared for anything from natural disasters like hurricanes and tornadoes, stock market crashes, riots...anything leading to civil unrest.
Instead of 50 states with states rights, and elected governors, there would be 10 regions and 10 Presidentially appointed Governors (ie Board of Governors). Instead of Elected Legislative Powers in Congress, there would be a number of Presidential Appointed Czars. Instead of Posse Comitatus which protects individuals and state government from intrusion by our own Military, The President is appointing Civil Servants Authoritarian Rule. Instead of helping in a state of Emergency, or National Disaster, our own Military will be ordered to assume Martial Law and take away individual rights, including and especially your 1st, 2nd and 10th amendment rights.
Executive Order 12407: Sets up ten Federal Regional Councils to govern ten Federal Regions made up of the fifty states and U.S. protectorates. Each of the states is to be divided into sub-regions so that Federal Executive control is provided over every community. (Ronald Reagan's Presidency)
REGION I: Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,
Vermont
Regional Capital: Boston
REGION II: New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands
Regional Capital: New York City
REGION III: Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia,
District of Columbia
Regional Capital: Philadelphia
REGION IV: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, Tennessee
Regional Capital: Atlanta
REGION V: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
Regional Capital: Chicago
REGION VI: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas
Regional Capital: Dallas - Ft. Worth
REGION VII: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Regional Capital: Kansas City
REGION VIII: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah,
Another bailout for Fannie Mae! When is too much, enough already. If I had this many family members in need every time I turned around, I would tell them to kiss my Fannie (a**). Somebody please oust this worthless piece of crap known as Obama and get a fiscal conservative in office.
Contributing Writer NICK TIMIRAOS, reprinted from the WSJ
Fannie Mae asked the U.S. government for an additional $8.4 billion in aid after posting an $11.5 billion net loss for the first quarter, the latest sign that the bailout of the mortgage investor and its main rival, Freddie Mac, is likely to be the most expensive legacy of the U.S. housing-market bust.
Fannie's losses reflected continuing weakness in the housing market and would have been worse without accounting changes that reduced its deficit. The quarterly loss was an improvement from the $23.5 billion loss for the year-ago quarter and marked the 11th consecutive quarterly loss for the Washington-based firm.
Fannie Mae is asking for an additional $8.4 billion in government aid after reporting an $11.5 billion net loss for the first quarter. WSJ's Nick Timiraos joins the News Hub with more.
The company has now racked up losses of nearly $145 billion, or nearly double its profits for the previous 35 years. While many of the nation's biggest banks have repaid their government loans and some are back to racking up big profits, Fannie and Freddie are still suffering from the housing-market crisis.
In recent weeks, the Treasury pointed out how private-sector banks, insurers and even auto makers have repaid loans under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. But red ink continues to gush from Fannie and Freddie because of their huge exposure to home loans.
"Everyone's trying to sweep it under the rug, but there's a very large embedded loss that hasn't been fully realized yet," says Kenneth Rosen, chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics at the University of California, Berkeley. "Someone's going to have to write a check, and it's very large."
The government's tab for Fannie will climb to $84 billion, while Freddie's stands at $61 billion. The government took control of both companies in 2008 through a legal process known as conservatorship as rising losses threatened to wipe out their thin capital reserves.
Fannie's losses have surpassed Freddie's because its $3 trillion book of loan guarantees is nearly one-third larger than Freddie's. Delinquencies are higher at Fannie because the firm more aggressively dialed up its appetite for riskier loans at the peak of the housing boom.
Losses at Fannie and Freddie continue to grow because the firms must set aside more capital to cover anticipated losses as mortgage delinquencies rise. The Treasury kicks in more capital every quarter if revenues can't meet those financial needs. Unlike many financial companies, the firms are exposed to a single asset class, holding nearly $5.5 trillion in mortgages and loan guarantees.Despite their losses, the firms are helping to stabilize the housing market. Fannie, Freddie and the Federal Housing Administration provided guarantees or insurance for 96.5% of the home mortgages that originated in the first quarter, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication. The companies also play a central role in the Obama administration's loan-modification effort designed to avert foreclosures.
One possible signal that losses will slow in the coming months: Fannie said 5.47% of its loans were 90 days or more past due at the end of March, down from 5.59% in February and the first monthly decline in nearly three years. That has stemmed in part from efforts to modify loans and from an uptick in liquidating delinquent loans through foreclosure. The company said Monday that credit losses could decline this year from record highs last year as delinquencies begin to level out.Fannie's capital hole would have risen by $3.3 billion without new accounting rules that took effect Jan. 1. The firm's losses were driven by deterioration in its $3 trillion book of loan guarantees, which accounted for a $12.5 billion loss.
The company's loan-loss reserves fell to $61 billion from $64 billion three months ago, even as its pool of nonperforming loans grew to $224 billion from $217 billion. "If I was the government, I would plead with Fannie or Freddie to reserve far more than they are right now," given the prospect of future home-price declines, said Anthony Sanders, a real-estate finance professor at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.
But the terms of the government conservatorship, which require Fannie and Freddie to pay an annual 10% dividend on their Treasury draw, could create an incentive to reserve more conservatively. Fannie had to pay the government $1.5 billion in dividends last quarter. "They don't want to raise the reserve levels because in a sense it doesn't matter and it could be perversely damaging to them," says Mr. Sanders.
In its filings Monday, in the coming months Fannie said it wasn't likely to repay that its debt to the Treasury for the "indefinite future."
Guest Contributor: Penny Star Reprinted from CNS News, May 7, 2010
One of the men who helped write Arizona’s new immigration law said he’s confident it will withstand legal challenges, because the law specifically addresses issues such as racial profiling, which are likely to be the basis of state or federal lawsuits.
“I’m confident Arizona will prevail,” Kris Kobach said Wednesday in a conference call with reporters. Kobach is a constitutional law professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and served as chief adviser to former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft on immigration law and border security.
Kobach said criticism that the Arizona law will impose new requirements on non-citizens to carry documents proving their status is unfounded, given that every non-citizen in the United States has been required to carry such documents since Congress passed the Alien Registration Act in 1940.
“It has been a federal crime for aliens to fail to keep certain registration documents on their person,” Kobach said, adding that the Arizona law simply makes it illegal in Arizona to violate that federal law.
All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law, Kobach said.
He said that any claims of an “equal protection violation” –- or racial profiling -– is also addressed in Arizona HB2162, which was signed into law last month by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer.
“Given that the law expressly prohibits racial profiling, it will be very difficult for them to prevail,” Kobach said.
He said the law was written with the expectation that it would be challenged by the same groups that have tried and failed to overturn other immigration laws in Arizona, including statutes that prevent people without proof of legal status from getting state benefits and those that require employers to use the federal E-Verify system to make sure only people with legal status are hired in the state.
Section II of the new law, Kobach said, states that a law enforcement officer “may not consider race, color or national origin” in making any stops or determining any aliens’ immigration status.
Most criminal statutes don’t include a specific provision barring racial profiling, instead relying on the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment for that protection. “So really, you have two layers of protection” against racial profiling, Kobach said.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), ranking member of the House Judiciary committee, scheduled the conference call to “dispel the myths” about the Arizona law.
"Over the past few weeks, we have all seen the uproar surrounding the recently passed Arizona immigration enforcement law,” Smith said. “The public outcry has been largely due to misinformation about the bill, which closely mirrors federal law.
“It is no surprise that Arizona felt the need to take action considering how its citizens have been affected by the serious violence along its border and the lack of border security,” Smith said. “Often, legal immigrant communities are hit the hardest by border-related crime, and also feel the strongest negative effects when it comes to competition for jobs.
“Instead of securing the border, the Obama administration is doing ‘amnesty on the cheap’ by not funding additional security and not enforcing the laws,” Smith said. “If the Obama administration continues to fail to secure the border, it should not be surprised if other states take similar action.”
Smith said perhaps one of the biggest myths out there is that the debate over the Arizona law is about immigration.
“Many open borders groups intentionally blur the line between legal and illegal,” Smith said. “But there is a difference between those who come the right way and those who enter the wrong way."
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Nearly 40 million Americans received food stamps -- the latest in an ever-higher string of record enrollment that dates from December 2008 and the U.S. recession, according to a government update.
Food stamps are the primary federal anti-hunger program, helping poor people buy food. Enrollment is highest during times of economic distress. The jobless rate was 9.9 percent, the government said on Friday.
The Agriculture Department said 39.68 million people, or 1 in 8 Americans, were enrolled for food stamps during February, an increase of 260,000 from January. USDA updated its figures on Wednesday.
Capitalist Paul Wild was quoted as saying "It's time to open some Liquor stores and check cashing places and get rich! Thank you Pimpsident Oh-Bama!"
Donn Janes, candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Tennessee's 8th district, signs the Contract for the American Dream
Donn Janes is proud to announce that he has signed the “Contract for the American Dream.” Link to signed contract “We have a duty as representatives of our respective Districts and States, to be guided by the Constitution, to be loyal to our constituents, our State and our Country.Adherence to these core principles will result in more jobs, more opportunity, more freedom, and consequently a better quality of life now and for future generations,” Janes said.
The Contract for the American Dream is a congressional action plan for the 112th Congress established by Jason Chaffetz, a conservative congressional freshman. This contract has been signed by conservative candidates and incumbents who feel the best hope for the United States of America is to return to the core principles of fiscal discipline, limited government, accountability, and a strong national defense.
“I proudly join those who have chosen to sign this contract and commit to this action plan for the 112th Congress.”
More information on the Contract for the American Dream and the others who have signed it can be found:Link to Contract for the American Dream Website .
What can our state representatives can do, if anything, about the collusion that is obviously going on between The President and Goldman Sachs (as well as other financial institutions) that will eventually completely bankrupt our country like Greece.
The new SC Elena Kagan has had dealings with Goldaman Sachs, and has never tried a case, but is for expanding the powers of The President and Indefinite detention without trial - both Unconstitutional.
The President has done so many unethical things in office, like serving as the President of two nations at once (he was the only US President to also sit as President of the UN Security Council), obvious collusion with Goldman Sachs, (carried on from former President Bush, also guilty), forcing the general public to buy a product or service and enforcing it through tax penalties, that he should be impeached. It is time to take the country back THROUGH THE STATES.
So are we an APATHETIC AMERICA? Are we going to sit around and swallow this mess? It is time to stand up and be accountable to our children and grandchildren's future. Who would have thought it would be a black man that would want to usher back in Slavery? We need to stand up and say we will not go silently into that night. We need to stand arm in arm with our legal national white, black, Hispanic, Native American and Asian brothers and sisters and tell this administration that WE WILL NOT become slaves to an Usurping Government!
The Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself. Don't be afraid of your Government. It was put into place with limited powers BY THE PEOPLE. We can take it back!
Lawrence Summers appointed Kagan the first female dean of Harvard Law School in 2003.[10] She succeeded Robert C. Clark, who had served as dean for over a decade. The focus of her tenure was on improving student satisfaction. Efforts included constructing new facilities and reforming the first-year curriculum, as well as aesthetic changes and creature comforts, such as free morning coffee. She has been credited for employing a consensus-building leadership style, which surmounted the school's previous ideological discord.
She also inherited a $400 million capital campaign, "Setting the Standard," in 2003. It ended in 2008 with a record breaking $476 million raised, 19% more than the original goal.[11] Kagan made a number of prominent new hires, increasing the size of the faculty considerably.
During her deanship, Kagan supported a long-standing policy barring military recruiters from campus, because she felt that the military's Don't ask, don't tell policy discriminated against gays and lesbians. According to Campus Progress,
As dean, Kagan supported a lawsuit intended to overturn the Solomon Amendment so military recruiters might be banned from the grounds of schools like Harvard. When a federal appeals court ruled the Pentagon could not withhold funds, she banned the military from Harvard’s campus once again. The case was challenged in the Supreme Court, which ruled the military could indeed require schools to allow recruiters if they wanted to receive federal money. Kagan, though she allowed the military back, simultaneously urged students to demonstrate against Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.[12][13]
In October 2003, Kagan transmitted an e-mail to students and faculty deploring that military recruiters had shown up on campus in violation of the school's anti-discrimination policy. It read, "This action causes me deep distress. I abhor the military's discriminatory recruitment policy." She also wrote that it was "a profound wrong -- a moral injustice of the first order."[14]
On January 5, 2009, President-elect Barack Obama announced he would nominate Kagan to be Solicitor General.[15] Before this appointment she had limited courtroom experience. She had never argued a case at trial,[16] and had not argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. This is not uncommon, however, as at least two previous Solicitors General, Robert Bork and Kenneth Starr, had no previous appellate experience at the Supreme Court, though Starr served as a Circuit Court Judge prior to acting as Solicitor General.[17]
At her confirmation hearing, Kagan also drew criticism for arguing that battlefield law, including indefinite detention without a trial, could apply outside of traditional battlefields.[18]
Kagan was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 19, 2009, by a vote of 61 to 31.[19] She made her first appearance in oral argument before the Supreme Court on September 9, 2009, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.[20]
During her hearings to be confirmed as Solicitor General, the New York Times paraphrases Kagan as saying "that someone suspected of helping finance Al Qaeda should be subject to battlefield law -- indefinite detention without a trial -- even if he were captured in a place like the Philippines rather than a physical battle zone."[21]
Donn Janes, candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Tennessee's 8th district, is asked to join the Freshmen 50 coalition? Donn Janes, West Tennnessee’s 8th District candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives, is proud to announce he is a candidate in the “Bullpen” of
The Freshmen 50. This is a coalition of candidates around the country dedicated to fiscal and legislative responsibility. This non-partisan PAC is a simple platform of six reforms - reforms that Americans are demanding.
- Apply the Law Equally: All laws that apply to all citizens also apply to Congress. (See note 1 below)
- Term Limits: Limit terms in Congress to no more than 12 years in the House and Senate, respectively.
- Enforce Congressional Ethics: Yearly tax and expense audits - former Congressmen and their staff cannot be lobbyists; allow the ethics committee to do its job.
- Read the Bill: Prior to final vote, the entire bill must be read out loud on the floor of the House; if a representative is not present for the entire reading, he cannot vote.
- Tax Reform: Repeal our current tax code in favor of one that taxes only once, at one rate, and require a 2/3-majority vote for any new tax. Donn Janes supports the FairTax as this solution.
- Balance the Budget: Amend the Constitution to require a balanced budget.
Currently, nearly 100 candidates have signed onto the platform and many of those candidates are in the most competitive races around the country. Any current candidate can join the Bullpen until September. This is the answer to the concerns of many Americans today – a coalition with the accountability and strength in numbers to get the job done.
The list of candidates will be made available at www.thefreshmen50.com beginning on May 3, 2010. The final 50 candidates will be selected based on a combination of their respective chance of success and the degree to which The Freshmen 50 PAC can make the biggest impact on the status quo. The final 50 candidates will receive PAC money and a national advertising campaign will be launched on their behalf.
Note 1: The exception to this is stated in Article I Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution.
Please e-mail contact@thefreshmen50.com for more information about The Freshmen 50 or contact (insert candidate’s e-mail and contact info).
THE FRESHMEN 50
PO Box 15023
Tucson, AZ 85708-5023
Jim TomasikCommunications Director Donn Janes For Congress Campaign 901 827 0120
Donn Janes is a candidate for the United States House of Representatives for Tennessee’s 8th Congressional District. A Navy veteran and businessman, Janes is an outspoken critic of how both the Republican and Democrat Parties have continued to ignore any calls for fiscal responsibility, causing the United States to plunge deeper into debt. ### About Donn Janes: Follow my campaign on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/pages/Donn-Janes/83098916614?ref=search
